I suggest switching back to an invitation-only system.
Isn’t this just going down Linux.Do’s old path again?
Actually, writing a short essay is pretty simple too.
Restricting registration IPs to residential networks should weed out a large number of bots ![]()
Everything else is fine, but the essay?? You said it was about answering questions and such, and then at the end there’s also “What have I been doing lately, and what am I interested in”? Why bother—imitating Shihuang? A lot of people here have criticized LinuxDo’s essay, and it backfired.
Didn’t the L site think the same way back then?
Sure enough, even just writing a little casually gets you to 50 characters.
What the L site calls kneeling isn’t the same thing.
L站 is a compliance test, not the same thing as a regular essay.
Just add SMS verification to XueGPT and it’s done.
Simple is best—don’t make it complicated.
After all, we’re different from the site next door—we don’t have obedience tests.
Information exchange is actually two-way: while moderators are reading these write-ups, they’re also being influenced by them (similarly to how Douyin moderators can be affected). If the write-ups are all flattering, moderators will inevitably develop corresponding feelings, which is also one of the reasons moderation on the L-site gradually went off course and turned into a test of obedience.
Two days later, I found out that James Zhan had gone bankrupt.
This kind of thing absolutely needs to be supported—otherwise, you can’t even study properly.
I registered a week ago, and I’m very supportive.