My blog only got started a few months ago, so I still have very few articles and images. There are currently fewer than 30 images in my image host, and my writing frequency is quite consistent: about one article per month, with an average of five images per article. That works out to roughly 60 images a year, so the overall scale is very small.
My image filenames are already well organized, and I have more than enough backups. I rarely need to look up old images or reuse them across articles. I keep going back and forth between a flat structure and categorizing them. On the one hand, I feel that a flat structure is completely sufficient at my current scale; on the other, I can’t help wanting to imitate the practices of major tech companies or experts and add some kind of directory structure to my image host. This contradiction has kept me stuck for a long time, unable to make a decision.
So should I use a flat structure, or some other kind of structure? The advice I got from AI didn’t seem very useful, which is why I came to ask for advice on the forum.
Supplement: This was resolved a long time ago. I decided to use one folder per year, such as 2026/xxx.webp.