Could the requirement for upgrading to Gold membership be lowered a bit?


Is 3,000 minutes really reasonable?

5 Likes

That makes quite a lot of sense… It can effectively prevent bot accounts.

3 Likes

I second that :ac01:

1 Like

There isn’t enough useful information to justify reading for this long.

7 Likes

Speaking from experience: the only thing limiting you is the number of days.

1 Like

I’m currently stuck on the number of days.

Agreed, I also find replying to topics difficult :ac01:

1 Like

Actually, fast users are only limited by the number of access days.

1 Like


Let’s wait.

I haven’t upgraded to Gold in over a year.

That makes a lot of sense—it’s much less than before~

1 Like

Will this Gold membership be downgraded?

I still need over 2,300 minutes.

I agree with patrick0306’s view: a 3,000-minute reading requirement can indeed effectively keep bot accounts out. But Mike123 also has a point—those who actually make it that far will most likely end up being blocked by the access-day requirement.

Too simple.

Keep it up :ac32:

There was a time when only 300 or 600 minutes were needed, but unfortunately, you came a little too late.

I can’t.

It’s actually quite a bit easier than this…

Take it slow; having a high level doesn’t seem to be much use.