Made a Nodeloc Wiki

Link: [upvote]Click me[/upvote]
This Wiki is not official. It is my own third-party project and has no affiliation, collaboration, or authorization relationship with the official Nodeloc team, nor does it represent the official position. None of the content above comes from firsthand sources. The modified Nodeloc logo currently in use was authorized by James.


Everyone is welcome to contribute.
There is just one goal: if you want to find out what happened at Nodeloc in the past, who worked on which projects, or what is worth digging through, you no longer need to search the entire forum—just search the wiki.

38 Likes

Support! Thanks for your hard work.

1 Like

This one also handed out subdomains and snagged an A.

Yes, it was split out and distributed. Anyway, I only need www and @.

to walk slowly

Have a look

1 Like

hyw

Subdomain distribution has been abused, so it could actually hurt SEO instead of helping it.

Looks awesome! I’m claiming a spot.

1 Like

Wow!
I’ll see later if I can contribute something.

Thanks for your hard work!

You can write about yourself now. As long as you’re an NL user, you can write your own autobiography. ()

How can I contribute?
Does it support CIL operations?

CLI is not supported. Search for the entry you want to contribute to; if it doesn’t exist, you’ll be prompted to create it.

Such a strange operational workflow,
but without cil, submitting may not be very convenient.
It would be great to support Git.

Because this system was further developed from a Korean person’s source code, and what he wrote back then wasn’t very complete()
Then I just added things whenever I remembered them()
I’m dead now. Let’s wait until 5.

ok ok

It’s 5 o’clock!

MediaWiki: The most canonical choice. Wikipedia itself runs on it, and its community collaboration capabilities are basically second to none: edit history, diff comparison, talk pages, templates, categories, user permissions, bots, and a full ecosystem of extensions. The downside is that it feels rather “old-school,” and creating a modern UI takes some tinkering.
Wiki.js: Much more modern. It offers solid support for collaborative editing, permissions, Markdown, search, and Git synchronization, and it’s also easier to deploy than MediaWiki. If you want to build a “modern community wiki,” it’s more pleasant to use than MediaWiki.

These two look pretty good

It’s being added—GPT is running right now.