Suggestions for improving fairness in community lottery mechanisms

Current community lottery uses a “energy points (NL) to purchase lottery tickets” model, where the winning probability is proportional to the number of tickets purchased. This mechanism tends to favor high-input users to a greater extent, leading to an over-reliance on “wealth” for winning opportunities, which is somewhat unfair.

To enhance fairness and participation experience, the following suggestions are proposed:

  1. Uniform Participation Threshold
  • Each participant only needs to consume 1 NL to obtain one lottery draw opportunity, ensuring equal winning probabilities for everyone.
  1. Energy Compensation Mechanism
  • The initiator of the lottery draw will receive a compensation of 100 times NL based on the number of participants from the official side.
    • For example: If there are 100 participants, the initiator directly receives 10,000 NL compensation.
  • If the lottery draw fails to sell out (no winners or canceled), the energy points consumed by participants will be fully refunded.
  1. Punishment and Restrictions
  • Users who initiate a lottery draw but fail to fulfill the prizes after the event will be permanently deprived of the right to post lottery draws.
  • The system can restrict the posting of lottery draws through keyword detection or labeling of违规users, immediately prompting “not allowed to post lottery draws” upon triggering.

This plan can improve the fairness of the lottery while also maintaining the enthusiasm of initiators and clearly constraining违规behavior.

奖券价格掌握在抽奖发起者手中的。 当初这么设置就是想让社区奉献更多的用户也有机会收获更多。 如果抽奖发起人介意公平,可以设置1NL;如果是娱乐或者为了获取能量,可以不限制。

而且1NL也有机会中,就是几率比较小。

按你的方案,补偿的NL也同样没处花了,通货膨胀就真的成数据库里面的数据了

1 Like

补偿100倍 你真敢想 10倍还有可能

奖品好的话,随便100个人参与,至少收入10000NL

钞能力,就不存在公平了。另外设置1NL ,发起者就得不到对应的奖励。毕竟按现在的规则奖品好的话,随便100个人参与,至少收入10000NL

我觉得你说的对

1 Like

抽奖本质是自我愉悦,抽奖的特性是随机,如果我愿意我可以花掉很多nl去参与,但不一定中,我不愿意我就花1nl参与,自我愉悦一下万一中了呢,所以不要执着于抽奖更不要沉迷于抽奖,我们要快乐(接受反驳哦,哈哈哈 :xhj46:

1 Like

我的能量攒着给自己看 :ac01:

1 Like