Posts seem to be locked for replies after a long time.
So, if this post is set to be visible only through replies, isn’t it meaningless for later visitors?
Is it necessary to allow some valuable posts to be dug up?
Posts seem to be locked for replies after a long time.
So, if this post is set to be visible only through replies, isn’t it meaningless for later visitors?
Is it necessary to allow some valuable posts to be dug up?
The host is really warm-hearted
Those with automatic closure are usually time-sensitive. Locked means they are out of date.
Manually locked ones are not worth mentioning~
So, which thread do you want to dig?
A little late, never happened before
Holding a hoe looking for still haven’t decided
Okay, digging up a good post without a reason
Digging unnecessarily ![]()
Don’t reply
Good suggestion
This suggestion is great, let’s have the talented designer work on it.
Can’t watch as it has expired
Estimated is also invalid
Reply visibility and doubling data usage by replying with an order number are two major toxins in internet forums, leading to useless replies filling up the website and hindering normal reading.
Strongly recommend revoking this feature and prohibiting such behavior.
The solution is to remove reply visibility, making all content always visible.
Actually, I think it could be made into a feature where posts are visible by likes only. Reply visibility is basically just thank you for sharing types of responses, and the actual content you want to discuss is hard to find. Plus, with so many notifications for the original post author, it’s impossible to read them all.
Expired can no longer be used, there’s no point in checking!
For example, many people’s one-click scripts are still usable, but later they couldn’t see them anymore.
I encountered this issue on other forums.
Ha ha, this is骂ing LET.
This is indeed true; many replies are just thanks and shares. It makes genuine feedback and interaction very inconvenient. It feels like there could be a better way to achieve this.
Reply可见可以考虑改为Like可见
This question I mentioned early on but was dismissed by many.